Early Church · Exodus 1 · Daniel 6 · Acts 5

Biblical Civil Disobedience: When Scripture Commands You to Disobey

Published August 2025 · 5:22 · 82+ views

Summary

The first act of civil disobedience in the Bible is performed by two women most people have never heard of. Shiphrah and Puah are Hebrew midwives given a direct royal command: kill every male infant born to Hebrew women. The command comes from the most powerful ruler in the ancient world. Their response:

“But the midwives feared God and did not do as the king of Egypt had told them; they let the boys live.” Exodus 1:17 (BSB)

When Pharaoh summons them to account for the Hebrew boys still alive, they tell him the Hebrew women are so vigorous they give birth before the midwives arrive. Whether this was true or a strategic lie, the text does not condemn it. Instead: “So God was good to the midwives, and the people multiplied and became very numerous. And because the midwives feared God, He gave them families of their own” (Exodus 1:20–21, BSB). God blessed their defiance. The same chapter that records Pharaoh's genocide records God rewarding the women who refused to participate in it.

The pattern repeats across Scripture with remarkable consistency. Daniel is thrown into a lions' den for continuing to pray after Darius's decree making prayer to any god but the king illegal for thirty days (Daniel 6:10). He does not pray in secret. He prays in front of his open window, three times a day, as he had always done. His civil disobedience is deliberate, public, and non-violent. God closes the lions' mouths.

“Now when Daniel learned that the decree had been published, he went home to his upstairs room where the windows opened toward Jerusalem. Three times a day he got down on his knees and prayed, giving thanks to his God, just as he had done before.” Daniel 6:10 (BSB)

The New Testament's most direct statement on the theology of civil disobedience comes from Peter and the apostles before the Sanhedrin. They have been commanded to stop preaching in Jesus's name. Their answer has become one of the most quoted lines in the theology of conscience:

“We must obey God rather than men.” Acts 5:29 (BSB)

This is not a general principle of anarchy. Romans 13:1–7 remains: governing authorities are established by God, and Christians owe them honor, taxes, and respect. The biblical theology is not “disobey whenever inconvenient.” It is precisely bounded: when human authority commands what God forbids, or forbids what God commands, the hierarchy resolves in favor of God. Shiphrah and Puah were commanded to kill. They refused. Daniel was forbidden to pray. He continued. The apostles were forbidden to preach. They kept preaching. In each case, the state was demanding something that placed itself in God's place — and each time, the response was the same.

The line of witnesses runs from the midwives through Daniel through the apostles through the early church martyrs through every generation of believers who have stood before human authority and said: “Judge for yourselves whether it is right in God's sight to listen to you rather than to God” (Acts 4:19, BSB). The question is not whether to submit to government. It is what to do when government demands you become complicit in what God calls evil.

Shiphrah & Puah

שִפְרָה · פּועָה

Two Hebrew midwives in Exodus 1:15–21 who were ordered by Pharaoh to kill every male infant born to Hebrew women. They refused. When Pharaoh confronted them, they lied to his face. The text records that God rewarded them with households of their own — the only individuals in the Exodus narrative to receive a specific divine blessing before the plagues begin. They are the Bible's first recorded conscientious objectors, and God blessed their disobedience.

What you'll learn

Frequently asked questions

Does the Bible support civil disobedience?

Yes, in specific circumstances. The Bible teaches both submission to governing authority (Romans 13:1-7, 1 Peter 2:13-17) and obedience to God over man when the two conflict (Acts 5:29, Acts 4:19). The examples are consistent: civil disobedience is warranted when government commands what God forbids (killing innocent people, ceasing prayer, stopping Gospel proclamation) or forbids what God commands (worship, caring for the vulnerable). The Hebrew midwives, Daniel, the three men in the fiery furnace (Daniel 3), Peter and John, and the early church martyrs all represent this pattern. None of them rebel against government in general; they refuse specific commands that violate their loyalty to God.

Did God approve of the midwives lying to Pharaoh?

The text records that God blessed them immediately after recording their deception (Exodus 1:20-21), without any editorial condemnation of the lie. This has generated significant theological discussion. Some argue that God blessed their faith (the decision to spare the children) independently of their method (the lie). Others argue the text shows God blessing the entire act, deception included, because it served a righteous end in an extreme situation. Most scholars agree the passage does not present the midwives' lie as a moral ideal to be generalized, but the text's silence on condemning it — combined with the explicit blessing — is significant.

How does Romans 13 relate to civil disobedience?

Romans 13:1-7 says governing authorities are established by God and Christians should submit to them, pay taxes, and give honor. This passage does not teach unconditional obedience to any government command. The same Paul who wrote Romans 13 was himself imprisoned, beaten by authorities, and eventually executed by Rome for refusing to stop preaching. The logic of Romans 13 is that government serves a legitimate God-ordained function (restraining evil, rewarding good — 13:3-4). When government inverts that function — rewarding evil and punishing good — it forfeits the theological basis for its claim on obedience. Peter's Acts 5:29 is not a contradiction of Romans 13; it is its limiting principle.

What is the difference between civil disobedience and rebellion?

Biblical civil disobedience is narrow, specific, and non-violent. It refuses a specific command that violates God's law while accepting the consequences. Daniel did not organize a coup against Darius; he prayed, was arrested, and trusted God with the outcome. The apostles did not arm themselves against the Sanhedrin; they continued preaching and accepted beatings and imprisonment. Shadrach, Meshach, and Abednego told Nebuchadnezzar directly: 'We will not serve your gods' (Daniel 3:18, BSB) — and then stood in the fire. Rebellion seeks to overthrow authority. Civil disobedience refuses to comply with a specific command while accepting the authority's power to punish. The distinction matters: one is political revolution; the other is conscience under pressure.

What is the 'Ekklesia' connection to civil disobedience?

The word ekklesia — used for the church in the New Testament — was originally a Greek political term for the assembly of free citizens called out to make decisions for the city-state. When the early church adopted this term, they were making a political claim: the community of Jesus's followers is a called-out assembly with a higher loyalty than the empire. The book of Revelation was written during Roman persecution and presents the empire as 'Babylon' — a system demanding worship that belongs only to God. The theology of biblical civil disobedience is not incidental to Christianity; it is woven into the very vocabulary the early church chose for itself.

Ad
📖
Formation Bible Study
Stop Reading. Start Studying.
Verse-by-verse inductive method  ·  Berean Study Bible  ·  AI Study Assistant  ·  Free to start
Study Deeper — Free
No credit card needed

Scripture references

All Scripture quotations from the Berean Standard Bible (BSB).

Full transcript

Click to expand transcript

Transcript publishing is in progress. The article above covers the same ground as the video. Watch the full study above.

Continue studying

Want to study Daniel 6, Acts 4–5, and Romans 13 together verse by verse?

Try Formation Bible Study →